{"id":5637,"date":"2012-08-24T11:59:24","date_gmt":"2012-08-24T15:59:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.multiplier-effect.org\/?p=5637"},"modified":"2012-08-24T12:02:02","modified_gmt":"2012-08-24T16:02:02","slug":"minsky-and-narrow-banking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/minsky-and-narrow-banking\/","title":{"rendered":"Minsky and Narrow Banking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The idea of breaking up the big banks, while seemingly growing in popularity, leaves a lot of unanswered questions.\u00a0 And one of the biggest questions is probably this:\u00a0 what will be the structure of the smaller institutions that remain after such a break up?\u00a0 If these smaller institutions are allowed to entangle themselves in the same complex activities as before, then we will still be a long way from stabilizing the financial system.<\/p>\n<p>In this context (and with a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imf.org\/external\/pubs\/ft\/wp\/2012\/wp12202.pdf\">IMF paper<\/a> reconsidering the Depression-era &#8220;Chicago Plan&#8221;), Jan Kregel looks at one potential proposal for simplifying the financial structure; an alternative to Dodd-Frank&#8217;s partiality and complexity.\u00a0 In his latest policy brief (&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.levyinstitute.org\/pubs\/ppb_125.pdf\">Minsky and the Narrow Banking Proposal: No Solution for Financial Reform<\/a>&#8220;), Kregel looks at Hyman Minsky&#8217;s consideration of a narrow banking proposal in the mid-1990s (at the time, Minsky was looking at potential reforms for a post-Glass-Steagall financial system).\u00a0 In this narrow banking proposal, commercial and investment banking functions would be separated into distinct subsidiaries of a bank holding company, with 100 percent reserves required for the deposit-taking subsidiary and a 100 percent ratio of capital to assets for the investment subsidiary.<\/p>\n<p>Minsky eventually turned against the proposal, and Kregel likewise concludes that narrow banking is not the answer.\u00a0 Among other reasons, Kregel notes that in such a narrow bank holding company system there would be no leverage, no liquidity creation, and no deposit-credit multiplier.\u00a0 Banks would not be able to act as the &#8220;handmaiden to innovation and creative destruction,&#8221; as he puts it.\u00a0 And for all that, the system would still be vulnerable to destabilization.\u00a0 &#8220;[T]he real problem that must be solved,&#8221; Kregel writes, &#8220;lies in the way that regulation governs the provision of liquidity in the financial system.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The idea of breaking up the big banks, while seemingly growing in popularity, leaves a lot of unanswered questions.\u00a0 And one of the biggest questions is probably this:\u00a0 what will be the structure of the smaller institutions that remain after such a break up?\u00a0 If these smaller institutions are allowed to entangle themselves in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":202,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[408,9,410,212,300,411,30,407,409],"class_list":["post-5637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-financial-reform","tag-chicago-plan","tag-financial-regulation","tag-fisher","tag-imf","tag-jan-kregel","tag-liquidity","tag-minsky","tag-narrow-banking","tag-simons"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/202"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5637"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5649,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5637\/revisions\/5649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}