{"id":4702,"date":"2012-05-10T15:50:34","date_gmt":"2012-05-10T19:50:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.multiplier-effect.org\/?p=4702"},"modified":"2012-05-14T11:49:21","modified_gmt":"2012-05-14T15:49:21","slug":"galbraith-appears-before-ron-paul-hearing-on-the-federal-reserve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/galbraith-appears-before-ron-paul-hearing-on-the-federal-reserve\/","title":{"rendered":"Galbraith Appears Before Ron Paul Hearing on the Federal Reserve"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Congressman Ron Paul held a subcommittee hearing on reform of the Federal Reserve system a couple days ago that featured testimony from Senior Scholar James Galbraith, Alice Rivlin, John Taylor, Jeffrey Herbener, and Peter Klein.\u00a0 There were a wide variety of topics addressed, including the size of the Fed&#8217;s balance sheet, proposals to make the Fed an arm of the Treasury, and changes to FOMC governance.<\/p>\n<p>Also raised was the question of whether to (formally) drop the employment side of the Fed&#8217;s dual mandate (because with unemployment at the dangerously low level of 8 percent and inflation sky high around 2 percent, clearly we&#8217;d be better off if the Fed were more like the ECB &#8230;).\u00a0 As Galbraith recounts, he himself was part of the team that drafted the Humphrey-Hawkins Act (&#8220;at a time of acute theoretical conflict in economics,&#8221; he points out), and he offers his defense of the dual mandate here:<\/p>\n<p><object style=\"height: 273px; width: 448px;\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" classid=\"clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000\" codebase=\"http:\/\/download.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/cabs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0\"><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"src\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/eU3ygeQUv_4?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage&amp;start=937\" \/><param name=\"allowfullscreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<p>As for the decided and observable tilt toward the price stability arm of the dual mandate, Galbraith collaborated on a working paper a few years back that identified the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.levyinstitute.org\/publications\/?docid=947\">real reaction function<\/a>&#8221; of the Fed:\u00a0 an aversion to full employment (&#8220;after 1983 the Federal Reserve largely ceased reacting to inflation or high unemployment, but continued to react when unemployment fell &#8216;too low.'&#8221;).\u00a0 Although the working paper only covers the period 1984-2003, it raises an interesting contemporary <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/freeexchange\/2012\/05\/monetary-policy\">question<\/a>: even if Congress produced a substantial fiscal stimulus or managed to keep public employment levels anywhere close to where they were in <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/economics\/2012\/05\/08\/unemployment-rate-without-government-cuts-7-1\/\">2008<\/a>, to what extent would the Fed accommodate the expansionary effects?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><em><strong>Update:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em><\/span> Galbraith&#8217;s statement before the subcommittee can be read <a href=\"http:\/\/financialservices.house.gov\/UploadedFiles\/HHRG-112-BA19-WState-JGalbraith-20120508.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Congressman Ron Paul held a subcommittee hearing on reform of the Federal Reserve system a couple days ago that featured testimony from Senior Scholar James Galbraith, Alice Rivlin, John Taylor, Jeffrey Herbener, and Peter Klein.\u00a0 There were a wide variety of topics addressed, including the size of the Fed&#8217;s balance sheet, proposals to make the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":202,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,40],"tags":[304,203,7,270,303,164,305,302],"class_list":["post-4702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employment","category-monetary-policy","tag-alice-rivlin","tag-dual-mandate","tag-federal-reserve","tag-fomc","tag-humphrey-hawkins","tag-james-galbraith","tag-john-taylor","tag-ron-paul"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/202"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4702"}],"version-history":[{"count":37,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4727,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4702\/revisions\/4727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}