{"id":12810,"date":"2015-11-20T09:23:47","date_gmt":"2015-11-20T14:23:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multiplier-effect.org\/?p=12810"},"modified":"2015-11-21T08:36:37","modified_gmt":"2015-11-21T13:36:37","slug":"mmt-and-the-new-new-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/mmt-and-the-new-new-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"MMT and the New New Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, Senator Bernie Sanders gave an important speech in which he invoked President Roosevelt\u2019s \u201cSecond Bill of Rights\u201d in defense of his platform. As Bernie rightly pointed out, all of Roosevelt\u2019s New Deal social programs to which we have become accustomed were tagged as \u201csocialism\u201d\u2014just as pundits are branding Bernie\u2019s proposals as dangerous socialist ideas. You can see Bernie\u2019s prepared remarks <a href=\"https:\/\/berniesanders.com\/democratic-socialism-in-the-united-states\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Just before Bernie\u2019s speech, I was asked to do an interview with Alex Jensen, on TBS eFM&#8217;s &#8220;This Morning&#8221; English radio program in Seoul, Korea. I was sent a list of questions and jotted down very brief responses. Unfortunately, in our radio interview we were only able to get through a few of these. You can listen to the interview <a href=\"https:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/kr\/podcast\/tbs-efm-this-morning\/id1038822609?l=en&amp;mt=2\">here<\/a>\u00a0(&#8220;1119 Issue Today with Professor L.R. Wray&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>As you will see, in addition to the subject of MMT and its critics, we talked about the platform of Senator Sanders and why his proposals have caught the imagination of the US population.<\/p>\n<p>Here are some of the questions and my brief (written) answers.<!--more--><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><em>So what is so unique and special about the MMT? What are the advantages?\u00a0What are the most important values that are\u00a0embedded in MMT?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>We begin by recognizing there is a difference between a currency user and the currency issuer. This should be obvious, but it has been lost in economics discourse. Almost all economists, policymakers, and the popular media start from the presumption that a government\u2019s budget is just like a household\u2019s. That is obviously false.<\/p>\n<p>What has been lost is an understanding of the operation of sovereign currency systems. That is what we\u2019ve tried to bring back. And we\u2019ve updated it and brought in a much more detailed analysis of monetary operations involved in fiscal policy.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><em>How is it the response to the 2008 financial crisis? In what measure can economic policies based on the MMT prevent crises of a similar kind?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There are two aspects to this. First there is the financial instability angle\u2014understood by Hyman Minsky and ignored by almost all economists and policymakers. It is not just that they \u201cnever saw it coming\u201d but rather they helped bring on the crisis by deregulating and moving to self-supervision.<\/p>\n<p>Then there is the chronically tight fiscal policy\u2014so that economic growth occurs only with private borrowing\u2014something Larry Summers and Paul Krugman sort of finally recognize. And when the crisis did hit and the private sector retrenched, the fiscal policy response was far too small.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><em>There also are a lot of criticisms of MMT. Especially when it comes to its unconventional, rather alternative view on fiscal balance.\u00a0What is your response to the opponents of MMT?\u00a0How would you answer those who cast skepticism about the feasibility of applying MMT to actual financial polity?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I haven\u2019t seen any criticism that was based on sound reasoning. Some complain that what we say isn\u2019t new. We never claimed to have invented all this\u2014we are mostly recovering what was lost. Others either don\u2019t understand what we\u2019re saying or purposely throw up strawmen to attack. Most do not understand sovereign currency, central banking, or banks.<\/p>\n<p>Most of MMT is descriptive. So this is not a matter of proposing something that is politically infeasible. It is a description when we say sovereign government cannot run out of its own currency.<\/p>\n<p>When we do move to policy, our prescriptions are well grounded in the facts of experience\u2014that is to say, in the way the economy really works. However, that does not mean that we believe it is politically easy.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><em>How can this be designed into a sophisticated policy and successfully implemented? Are there any strategies that you have in mind?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Abba Lerner laid out the general design, calling it functional finance. The budget ought to be formed to achieve full employment with relative price stability\u2014not in order to achieve some specific \u201cbalance\u201d of the budget (i.e., a deficit-to-GDP or debt-to-GDP ratio). We ought to add to his goals policy to maintain financial stability.<\/p>\n<p>A key component of any such strategy should be the ELR or JG program that Minsky advocated.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li><em>How can a country&#8217;s financial condition remain sound and stable when the state can issue money whenever needed?\u00a0Are there any limits or countermeasures to such problems?\u00a0How can we deal with the inflation or stagflation stemming from excessive issuance of currency?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The danger of spending too much money is inflation; there might also be an impact on exchange rates. The solution to the first problem is to avoid spending more once full employment is reached; and to carefully target spending even before full employment to avoid bottlenecks. The solution to the second is to float the currency.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"6\">\n<li><em>Why is austerity not effective in raising the employment rate?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Because austerity necessarily destroys jobs. The only way that can increase the employment rate is to chase people out of the labor force after they\u2019ve given up all hope of finding a job.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"7\">\n<li><em>How can the MMT influence the international finance? Is there any chance the US can become an entity like OPEC which decides the price of oil? In other words, if the US can decide the amount of money they want to print, can&#8217;t it also decide the price of US currency, disturbing the international monetary system?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As a major oil producer the US can of course influence the price of oil. We can expand our oil buffer stock program. But I\u2019m not sure that is a good idea at all. We need to reduce oil consumption.<\/p>\n<p>We could do that with other commodities, but again I\u2019m not sure why that would be a good idea. I\u2019d just operate a bufferstock program for labor\u2014through the ELR\/JG program\u2014to set the base wage. I\u2019d let most other prices float. And I\u2019d let the dollar float. Of course, the value of the dollar is mostly determined by the rest of the world, not by US policy.<\/p>\n<p>As the issuer of the main international reserve currency it is important for the US to provide it. We do that by running current account deficits, or by lending dollars. If the world\u2019s demand for dollars remains high, the US will continue to lend dollars and to run trade deficits.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, Senator Bernie Sanders gave an important speech in which he invoked President Roosevelt\u2019s \u201cSecond Bill of Rights\u201d in defense of his platform. As Bernie rightly pointed out, all of Roosevelt\u2019s New Deal social programs to which we have become accustomed were tagged as \u201csocialism\u201d\u2014just as pundits are branding Bernie\u2019s proposals as dangerous socialist ideas. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":208,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[999,151,1135,218],"class_list":["post-12810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-modern-monetary-theory","tag-bernie-sanders","tag-mmt","tag-modern-monetary-theory","tag-new-deal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/208"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12810"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12820,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12810\/revisions\/12820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bard.edu\/multiplier-effect\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}